For Self-Funded Employers

Find the claims errors costing your plan money — before your stop-loss carrier or your employees do.

You fund every claim your health plan pays. Verq checks every one of them against your plan document — and shows you what matched, what didn’t, and what it’s costing you.

Stop-Loss Filing · Illustrative Departs from the plan

§6.2 · Utilization Mgmt  “Inpatient admissions require prior authorization…”

Claim: $900,000 admission, paid in full — against a $250,000 stop‑loss attachment point. Prior authorization: not on file.

Adjudicated per the plan $650,000 reimbursed to your plan above the attachment point — filed with the proof Departs from the plan $650,000 reimbursement denied or clawed back — your plan’s cost

Same claim. The stop-loss carrier checks every line against your plan before it pays.
Who checked before the filing?

Caught while it’s correctable — not inside the dispute.
What It Costs You

When claims drift from the plan, the plan pays for it.

OverpaymentsMoney

The errors you’ll never see.

Misapplied cost-sharing. Benefits paid outside the plan’s terms. Exclusions that weren’t applied. Each one is small. Across a year of claims, they’re a line item — one nobody is itemizing.

Stop-lossRecovery

The check that doesn’t come.

When a large claim hits your attachment point, the carrier’s first move is to check whether it was adjudicated per the plan. If it wasn’t, reimbursement gets denied or clawed back — and the plan eats it. The worst time to discover an adjudication error is inside a stop-loss dispute.

ForesightCash flow

The large claim nobody saw building.

Surprises aren’t a strategy. Verq’s continuous verification reads the whole claims stream against the plan — utilization, performance, and what’s accumulating toward your attachment points — before it lands.

PeopleDisruption

The employee problem that escalates.

A claim denied against the plan’s own terms doesn’t stay a claims issue. It becomes an HR issue, then a retention issue, then occasionally a legal one. Catching departures early keeps them boring.

The recordDuty

The file that’s empty when someone asks.

Plan sponsors have a duty to monitor the people running their plan — and courts are increasingly asking employers to show their work. “We trust our TPA” is not documentation. A record of every claim checked, with citations, is.

What You Get

Three answers. Every claim. On the record.

Every claim comes back as one of three verdicts, each cited to the exact plan section that governs it.

Matches the plan

Most claims match. That matters too: it’s proof your plan is being run right, in a file you can show.

Departs from the plan

Not an accusation — a finding. Resolved with a question to the TPA, a written instruction, or a correction.

?

Needs clarification

The plan is ambiguous or silent. The finding drives a documented interpretation or a note for renewal.

Most of what Verq finds gets fixed with a conversation. That’s what oversight looks like when it’s working.

How It Starts

Begin with a document you already have.

Step 1

Your plan document, audited.

Before a single claim is pulled, Verq reads your governing documents — the SPD and, where one exists, the wrap or master plan document — and flags the ambiguities, the gaps, and the places the documents disagree with each other. Those are the provisions a claim decision can’t defend.

Step 2

Your history, verified.

Through your plan’s data rights, every adjudicated claim is checked against the plan. We provide the data-request template; your advisor can run the process.

Step 3

Your plan, watched.

Continuous verification as claims are adjudicated — errors caught while they’re correctable, and cash-flow visibility while it’s still foresight.

Work With Your Advisor

The best way to start is with the person who already knows your plan.

Verq is delivered by benefits advisors as part of plan stewardship. If you have a broker or consultant, ask them about running a Verq audit — many already deliver it as part of their service.

To guide that conversation, we made a one‑page checklist — six things your plan’s reporting should show you, from the governing documents to stop‑loss tracking. Get it below and bring it to your next broker meeting.

One page, no spam — just the checklist to guide your stewardship conversation.

Prefer to talk it through first? Talk to the founders — 20 minutes

What Employers Are Saying

“We trust our TPA.”

Most TPAs do good work — and most claims will match the plan. Trust is not the issue; verification is. The difference is a record.

“Is this an audit of our TPA?”

It’s a verification of the plan. Findings are framed as three plain verdicts, not accusations, and most resolve with a question or an instruction. TPAs that administer plans well come out of this looking good — provably.

“We already get claims reports.”

A paid-claims report is a total. It can’t tell you whether any claim followed the plan, and it can’t defend a stop-loss reimbursement. A number is not an answer.

“What does it cost?”

Verq starts with a plan-document audit that requires nothing but the document. Pricing scales with the plan from there — talk to your advisor or to us.